• Photo 40
    Notes 
When beauty becomes mandatory, it ceases to be about fun, about play. Dressing up, playing with gender roles, doing your braids badly in the mirror, and eating half your mother’s lipstick in an attempt to get it on your face: Do you remember when that used to be fun? And do you remember when the fun stopped? Like any game, the woman game stops being fun when you start playing to win, especially if you’ve got no choice: Win or be ridiculed, win or become invisible, dismissed — disturbed.

Laurie Penny, “Model Behavior”
Originally published in The New Inquiry No. 4: Beauty. Support The New Inquiry. Subscribe today.

    When beauty becomes mandatory, it ceases to be about fun, about play. Dressing up, playing with gender roles, doing your braids badly in the mirror, and eating half your mother’s lipstick in an attempt to get it on your face: Do you remember when that used to be fun? And do you remember when the fun stopped? Like any game, the woman game stops being fun when you start playing to win, especially if you’ve got no choice: Win or be ridiculed, win or become invisible, dismissed — disturbed.

    Laurie Penny, “Model Behavior”

    Originally published in The New Inquiry No. 4: Beauty. Support The New Inquiry. Subscribe today.

    #l. penny #essay #magazine 
  • Photo 52
    Notes 
I want to emphasize that what I really got out of this is a sense that nothing I was doing defended my interests very much. I was acting against my hopes. I couldn’t distance myself from the story I believed was true.

imp kerr: This, too, is for the best

    I want to emphasize that what I really got out of this is a sense that nothing I was doing defended my interests very much. I was acting against my hopes. I couldn’t distance myself from the story I believed was true.

    imp kerr: This, too, is for the best

    #Imp Kerr #Shines Like Gold 
  • Quote 14
    Notes
    "Are poets – to wax Shelley-an – the unacknowledged legislators of the world? Would it be better if they were? Perhaps, but if they were, they’d be shitty poets."

    Aaron Bady on the shortlist for the Caine Prize for African Writing

    #A. Bady #Zunguzungu 
  • Quote 58
    Notes
    "It’s like, what do you mean relationships aren’t like in the movies? It makes me feel very stupid, so I sort of think of writing as a way of figuring out the truth for yourself. If you’re writing something and it obviously strikes you as false, you can’t write it. And so by writing, you discover what seems true to you. What seems real. It’s a way of thinking through things. I feel like the question of how should a person be, it was a question I took on and emphasized it and really wanted to work to the end of it."

    Sheila Heti interviewed by Emily Keeler

    #essay #interview #sheila heti #e. keeler 
  • Photo 67
    Notes 
When I was in college, the hot new face belonged to an actress named Jennifer Aniston, who, at age 25, had found herself with the coveted Rachel haircut and a hit TV show. Thirteen years after my graduation, who do I see on magazine covers? A 43-year-old Jennifer Aniston. And a 39-year-old Gwyneth Paltrow, 36-year-old Kate Winslet, 42-year-old Jennifer Lopez, 42-year-old Tina Fey, and 36-year-old Reese Witherspoon—all of whom were big or rapidly on their way there when they, and I, were in our 20s. Add to that the 38-year-old Elizabeth Banks, 33-year-old Rachel McAdams, 32-year-old Zooey Deschanel, 33-year-old Kate Hudson, 38-year-old Heidi Klum, 37-year-old Christina Hendricks, and 36-year-old Angelina Jolie, and it gets harder and harder to believe that Hollywood truly does fetishize youth as much as we say it does. Yes, there will always be the 18-year-old Dakotas and 22-year-old Kristens, but we’re in an unprecedented age of mature women being construed as alluring in the mainstream press. Julianne Moore is 51. Want to know who else was 51? Rue McClanahan, when The Golden Girls first aired. 

The Beheld on what 36 looks like

    When I was in college, the hot new face belonged to an actress named Jennifer Aniston, who, at age 25, had found herself with the coveted Rachel haircut and a hit TV show. Thirteen years after my graduation, who do I see on magazine covers? A 43-year-old Jennifer Aniston. And a 39-year-old Gwyneth Paltrow, 36-year-old Kate Winslet, 42-year-old Jennifer Lopez, 42-year-old Tina Fey, and 36-year-old Reese Witherspoon—all of whom were big or rapidly on their way there when they, and I, were in our 20s. Add to that the 38-year-old Elizabeth Banks, 33-year-old Rachel McAdams, 32-year-old Zooey Deschanel, 33-year-old Kate Hudson, 38-year-old Heidi Klum, 37-year-old Christina Hendricks, and 36-year-old Angelina Jolie, and it gets harder and harder to believe that Hollywood truly does fetishize youth as much as we say it does. Yes, there will always be the 18-year-old Dakotas and 22-year-old Kristens, but we’re in an unprecedented age of mature women being construed as alluring in the mainstream press. Julianne Moore is 51. Want to know who else was 51? Rue McClanahan, when The Golden Girls first aired. 

    The Beheld on what 36 looks like

    #A. Whitefield-Madrano #the beheld 
  • Photo 11
    Notes 
What all this crying and loneliness in the Bee Gees’ music promises is that there is no consolation in denying it, and no point in trying to come up with arch ways of disguising it or revealing it, as if that would make sadness more tractable. 

Rob Horning on the Bee Gees

    What all this crying and loneliness in the Bee Gees’ music promises is that there is no consolation in denying it, and no point in trying to come up with arch ways of disguising it or revealing it, as if that would make sadness more tractable. 

    Rob Horning on the Bee Gees

    #R. Horning #marginal utility 
  • Photo 71
    Notes 
Have you seen the New Aesthetic? Everyone in the Twittersphere was talking about it. Depending on whom you ask, it was a “shareable concept,” (James Bridle) a “theory object,” (Bruce Sterling) and a “weird, hot, movement” (Ian Bogost). Or simply “things James Bridle posts to his Tumblr,” as Bogost quips — and to which we might add, “which got really popular really fast and I wish I knew what it actually was.” Bridle’s Tumblr became a SXSW talk in March 2012. And then a week later, Bruce Sterling wrote a 5,000-word opus on the New Aesthetic for Wired. As if to a younger sibling, praising and cautioning in equal measures, he contextualized the New Aesthetic as not just a Tumblred accumulation but the art movement 21st century creatives had desperately been waiting for. The essay was a flash point, prompting a flood of responses. What better empyrean spark than the convergence of SXSW and, as he describes himself on his Twitter bio, “one of the better known Bruce Sterlings”? 

Rahel Aima, ”Desiring Machines”

    Have you seen the New Aesthetic? Everyone in the Twittersphere was talking about it. Depending on whom you ask, it was a “shareable concept,” (James Bridle) a “theory object,” (Bruce Sterling) and a “weird, hot, movement” (Ian Bogost). Or simply “things James Bridle posts to his Tumblr,” as Bogost quips — and to which we might add, “which got really popular really fast and I wish I knew what it actually was.” Bridle’s Tumblr became a SXSW talk in March 2012. And then a week later, Bruce Sterling wrote a 5,000-word opus on the New Aesthetic for Wired. As if to a younger sibling, praising and cautioning in equal measures, he contextualized the New Aesthetic as not just a Tumblred accumulation but the art movement 21st century creatives had desperately been waiting for. The essay was a flash point, prompting a flood of responses. What better empyrean spark than the convergence of SXSW and, as he describes himself on his Twitter bio, “one of the better known Bruce Sterlings”?
     

    Rahel Aima, ”Desiring Machines”

    #r. aima #essay 
  • Photo 13
    Notes When I spoke to Heti at her apartment in Toronto to talk about the novel, I couldn’t help but wonder if by including her friends in the book she was directing their fate, essaying to produce their lives.

SH: No, that never occurred to me. Because the book all took place right now, so there’s no future element. It’s just because it was difficult. It’s like if you’ve had a difficult thing in a relationship, you don’t go and bring it up all the time. It was a big enough thing in all of our lives that to talk about it would make it even bigger. I mean, Sholem was down in Austin, Texas, and a guy was like “Are you the Sholem in Sheila Heti’s book?” So that was kind of glamorous for him. But that was the only time we’ve talked about the book in the last year. The whole thing takes place in the past, and because I see such a difference between my friends and the characters I don’t think it’s about writing their fate. It’s just the characters based on them.
EMK: Do you get sick of answering that question?
SH: No, I think it’s a fair question, and even if I did try 100 percent to depict them as they are, still a person’s such a different thing from words in a book. You can’t really ever think that that’s a person.

Emily Keeler interviews Sheila Heti
Painting: Margaux Williamson, House for a Head, a portrait of Sheila Heti

    When I spoke to Heti at her apartment in Toronto to talk about the novel, I couldn’t help but wonder if by including her friends in the book she was directing their fate, essaying to produce their lives.

    SH: No, that never occurred to me. Because the book all took place right now, so there’s no future element. It’s just because it was difficult. It’s like if you’ve had a difficult thing in a relationship, you don’t go and bring it up all the time. It was a big enough thing in all of our lives that to talk about it would make it even bigger. I mean, Sholem was down in Austin, Texas, and a guy was like “Are you the Sholem in Sheila Heti’s book?” So that was kind of glamorous for him. But that was the only time we’ve talked about the book in the last year. The whole thing takes place in the past, and because I see such a difference between my friends and the characters I don’t think it’s about writing their fate. It’s just the characters based on them.

    EMK: Do you get sick of answering that question?

    SH: No, I think it’s a fair question, and even if I did try 100 percent to depict them as they are, still a person’s such a different thing from words in a book. You can’t really ever think that that’s a person.

    Emily Keeler interviews Sheila Heti

    Painting: Margaux Williamson, House for a Head, a portrait of Sheila Heti

    #e. keeler #sheila heti #essay 
  • Photo 28
    Notes 
Saying The Middle Stories are sad is like saying life is sad: true, but not true enough. It would be easy to categorize the storiesas depressive twee, the kind of book that goes to the Farmer’s Market because it doesn’t know what else to do. Instead, these bits are punctuated fragments of an unbounded hopelessness, without the reassuring container of conventional narrative. Their characters don’t have the narrowing traits that tell the reader, “Don’t worry, this is about someone else.” They’re stripped down for maximum impact. Heti’s expansive shorts recall Thomas Bernhard inThe Voice Imitator or Raymond Carver in Will You Please Be Quiet, Please? more than David Foster Wallace in Brief Interviews with Hideous Men or Eggers in How We Are Hungry. In Heti’s stories, there’s little consolation in life’s little victories; they’re merely the stitching of life’s mesh of voids and disappointments. There’s no morbid self-satisfaction in authorial artifice, only the unceasing approach of the unavoidable. When you wink into the abyss, Heti offers, it doesn’t wink back.

Malcolm Harris reviews The Middle Stories, by Sheila Heti

Painting: Margaux Williamson, The Weeds

    Saying The Middle Stories are sad is like saying life is sad: true, but not true enough. It would be easy to categorize the storiesas depressive twee, the kind of book that goes to the Farmer’s Market because it doesn’t know what else to do. Instead, these bits are punctuated fragments of an unbounded hopelessness, without the reassuring container of conventional narrative. Their characters don’t have the narrowing traits that tell the reader, “Don’t worry, this is about someone else.” They’re stripped down for maximum impact. Heti’s expansive shorts recall Thomas Bernhard inThe Voice Imitator or Raymond Carver in Will You Please Be Quiet, Please? more than David Foster Wallace in Brief Interviews with Hideous Men or Eggers in How We Are Hungry. In Heti’s stories, there’s little consolation in life’s little victories; they’re merely the stitching of life’s mesh of voids and disappointments. There’s no morbid self-satisfaction in authorial artifice, only the unceasing approach of the unavoidable. When you wink into the abyss, Heti offers, it doesn’t wink back.

    Malcolm Harris reviews The Middle Stories, by Sheila Heti
    Painting: Margaux Williamson, The Weeds

    #M. Harris #essay #Sheila Heti 
  • Photo 69
    Notes 
Intellectual distinction isn’t everything, it’s true. But things are amiss in other areas as well: sociability and trust, for example. “During the last third of the twentieth century,” according to Robert Putnam in Bowling Alone, “all forms of social capital fell off precipitously.” Tens of thousands of community groups – church social and charitable groups, union halls, civic clubs, bridge clubs, and yes, bowling leagues — disappeared; by Putnam’s estimate, one-third of our social infrastructure vanished in these years. Frequency of having friends to dinner dropped by 45 percent; card parties declined 50 percent; Americans’ declared readiness to make new friends declined by 30 percent. Belief that most other people could be trusted dropped from 77 percent to 37 percent. Over a five-year period in the 1990s, reported incidents of aggressive driving rose by 50 percent — admittedly an odd, but probably not an insignificant, indicator of declining social capital.

George Scialabba, “How Bad Is It?”

    Intellectual distinction isn’t everything, it’s true. But things are amiss in other areas as well: sociability and trust, for example. “During the last third of the twentieth century,” according to Robert Putnam in Bowling Alone, “all forms of social capital fell off precipitously.” Tens of thousands of community groups – church social and charitable groups, union halls, civic clubs, bridge clubs, and yes, bowling leagues — disappeared; by Putnam’s estimate, one-third of our social infrastructure vanished in these years. Frequency of having friends to dinner dropped by 45 percent; card parties declined 50 percent; Americans’ declared readiness to make new friends declined by 30 percent. Belief that most other people could be trusted dropped from 77 percent to 37 percent. Over a five-year period in the 1990s, reported incidents of aggressive driving rose by 50 percent — admittedly an odd, but probably not an insignificant, indicator of declining social capital.

    George Scialabba, “How Bad Is It?”

    #essay #g. scialabba 
  • Text 16
    Notes American police officer is under investigation after allegedly breaking into his neighbour’s house to do his laundry.

    Shines Like Gold, Triple Decker Weekly

    #Imp Kerr #Shines Like Gold 
  • Quote 27
    Notes
    "And, after all, it is a very poor consolation to be told that the man who has given one a bad dinner, or poor wine, is irreproachable in his private life. Even the cardinal virtues cannot atone for half-cold entrées."

    Oscar Wilde, The Picture of Dorian Gray (1891)

    Read More

    #Austerity Kitchen #c. baumgarthuber 
For Tumblr
By Peter Vidani
Theme: Papercut
  • Link via ladyjournos
    Anna Breslaw: The Unfuckables

    Some viewers seem to believe that it’s progressive to appreciate a weird, nerdy female loser, but there is nothing...

    Link via ladyjournos
  • Photo via newyorker

    Click-through to find out the story behind this week’s cover “Adrift” by Mark Ulriksen, and for a slideshow of past New Yorker covers about...

    Photo via newyorker
  • Photo via triplecanopy

    sleep in a sandwich!, 1970.

    Photo via triplecanopy
  • Photo via colorfulrambunction

    Cover illustration and design for S P O O K magazine. May 2012.

    Photo via colorfulrambunction
  • Photo via champagnecandy

    b&w gif from the most perfect music video ever. Mick Rock directed. Also Bowie’s suit and eye makeup.

    Photo via champagnecandy
  • Photoset via worldpaintings

    Georges Seurat

    The Seine and la Grande Jatte (with detail), 1888, oil on canvas, 65 x 82 cm, Royal Museums of Fine Arts of Belgium, Brussels.

    Photoset via worldpaintings
  • Photo via kittensbecomekats

    I love everything I’ve seen this man write so far. Very interesting interpretations of media & culture from a neo-marxist perspective. Read here for...

    Photo via kittensbecomekats
  • Photo via misssydneyt

    thenewinquiry:

    What we pin, post, and “like” allows us to demonstrate our refined tastes, to declare publicly what we deem picturesque. Part...

    Photo via misssydneyt
  • Photo via mechanicalmystic

    My newest piece in The New Inquiry re: the desert, Foucault, heterotopia, LSD, Art Bell, Vegas, music, cars, everything.

    thenewinquiry:

    In a...

    Photo via mechanicalmystic